The dirty words these days
03.08.2022 at 4:26 PM
Anyone notice how you can’t say anything these days without being critiqued, criticized, or ridiculed. I can’t remember who it was, but I read about some celebrity getting called out because she said she was glad she was a woman. How unfeeling of her! How rude! How discriminatory to people who don’t relate to their physical gender for her to enjoy hers?!?!
And don’t let anyone catch you using the word “Research” unless you have a PHD. Of course, regular every day drones can’t possibly search out information, systematically look at it from all sides, review what they have learned and hypothesize or draw conclusions from it. (I mean it is difficult in this day and age where anyone with an opposing view to the mainstream is automatically labelled as a spreader of misinformation which make it hard to read all sides of an issue. But that is another topic for another day.)
So I will add one of my own dirty words
Science – or rather, the phrase “follow the science” which is being used by all side to declare that their approach is the only one. It seems like a lot of people using this term use it to mean following what everyone else is saying or doing, rather than actually following the scientific method. Do you remember that from school? The steps you had to use to validate if you had legitimately investigated something.
The six steps of the scientific method include:
1) asking a question about something you observe,
2) doing background research to learn what is already known about the topic,
3) constructing a hypothesis,
4) experimenting to test the hypothesis,
5) analyzing the data from the experiment and drawing conclusions, and
6) communicating the results to others.
Doctors (in general) sure as hell are not scientists and don’t tell me they are. They have learned piles of information sure, and know at lot of information that has been published. But that does not mean that they think with an inquisitive mind, that they hypothesize, or are open to multiple answers other than the information they have been fed.
And Big Pharma does not follow science – those numbers 5 and 6 seem to be beyond anyone with a big pay cheque.
And since I’m on a rant today I’ll just add these little thoughts as well
“Anecdotal evidence” does not mean something isn’t true – it means that studies have not been funded to prove it. Who is going to fund the study showing that a readily available and economic cure is better than a patented pharmaceutical option. OR a study that shows that the side effects of a lucrative drug are worth more caution than they are given. Surely big pharma won’t be funding those studies.
Vaccine injury is real. Not just vaccine injury, but medical and pharmacological injury. All medications and medical interventions have an element of risk, a list of side effects, a possible bad outcome that is worse than what was set out to be resolved. For people to pretend that is not true just boggles my mind.
bEfOrE ~ AftEr
hahaha
Gallery
www.flickr.com
More of normaltoilet's photos
hahaha
Gallery
www.flickr.com
|
wHaT dO u tHiNk ?
What is a normaltoilet?